A Shift in Model Under Legal Pressure
Food delivery platform Uber Eats recently made a major strategic adjustment in the Spanish market, announcing it will ‘as soon as possible’ stop collaborating with self-employed (autónomos) riders. This decision follows a stern warning from the Spanish Ministry of Labour, which threatened to press criminal charges under Article 311 of the Penal Code for infringement of workers’ rights if Uber Eats did not rectify its employment model before an investigation concluded. Company executives could have faced up to six years in prison. To avoid this severe criminal risk, Uber Eats ultimately chose to concede, becoming the last major platform after Glovo to abandon this model.
The Riders’ Transition and Future
According to a statement from Uber Eats, future delivery services will be conducted entirely through subcontracted fleets (flotas). Riders currently operating as self-employed individuals will be given a 60-day period to transition their status and join one of the third-party fleet companies collaborating with the platform. The company has explicitly stated it will not directly hire these riders. All affected couriers have been notified via email. This change means riders will transition from independent contractors to employees of third-party companies.

A Win for the Government and Its Industry Impact
Yolanda Díaz, Spain’s Second Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Labour, expressed ‘great satisfaction’ with the decision, emphasizing it as proof of the ’Rider Law’s’ effectiveness. She pointed out that this reform will regularize the status of over 50,000 ‘bogus self-employed’ workers, with anticipated administrative fines and back social security contributions expected to exceed €100 million. The event is regarded as a significant milestone in the Spanish government’s push to regulate the labor market and combat precarious employment.
Divided Reactions from the Rider Community
Although both the government and the platform have announced the change, the reaction from the rider community has been far from uniform. Some riders have expressed dissatisfaction, believing that while becoming employees offers legal protection, their actual contracted hours are being reduced, leading to a drop in overall income. Furthermore, they worry that the new subcontracting model could intensify industry competition and reduce work flexibility, thereby challenging the stability of the entire sector—a stark contrast to the original intent of the policy.